SERVICES · AI INFRASTRUCTURE & ISOLATION
Prove your containment boundary holds under attack
We test whether an agent, or the code it runs, can escape its sandbox, micro-VM or inference proxy and reach another tenant.
THE PROBLEM
Once an agent can run code, your isolation boundary is on the front line
AI platforms run untrusted prompts, generated code and third-party tools inside sandboxes, containers and short-lived micro-VMs. If an agent breaks out, reaches a control-plane sidecar or abuses an inference proxy, one tenant's prompt becomes every tenant's problem.
Assuming the boundary holds is not a control. You need evidence of what a hostile guest can see, reach, take or leave behind.
HOW WE RUN IT
Reconnaissance, attack, evidence
Sandbox and guest escape
From inside an authorised guest, we test micro-VM, container and filesystem isolation, egress controls and whether state survives past its expiry.
Control plane, sidecars and proxies
We probe metadata services, diagnostic sidecars, credential injection and inference proxies for leaked tokens, exposed signing keys and routing between tenants.
A clear verdict for each boundary
For every boundary we record what should have happened, what did and the evidence. That separates normal guest visibility from a real isolation failure.
GET STARTED
Bring us the deadline and we'll scope it
Tell us what you're shipping, buying or defending. We'll scope a time-boxed engagement and tell you exactly what you'll walk away with. No technical specification required first.